Speaker throws out Minority motion for drug seizures inquiry; Afenyo-Markin vows to press on

Pinned summary · as of 15:51

Speaker Alban Bagbin threw out a Minority motion for a committee on major narcotics seizures linked to Ghana at an emergency sitting of Parliament on Tuesday, 29 September 2026. Minority Leader Alexander Afenyo-Markin, the MP for Effutu, publicly rejected the ruling and said his caucus would look for other ways to keep the matter before the House.

What we know

• An emergency sitting of Parliament on Tuesday, 29 September 2026, ended with Speaker Alban Bagbin declaring the Minority's motion inadmissible, after which the House adjourned until further notice.
• Parliament was brought back for the sitting after the Minority Caucus asked for a recall to deal with the motion.
• The Speaker grounded the ruling in Standing Orders 5 and 6 and in Order 103 (Sub-Rule F). Onua Online, The Publisher Online and The Vaultz News also list Orders 192 and 233 among his grounds, and the first two say he dismissed the motion in limine. Reports say his concern was that the inquiry would cover much of the same ground as cases now before the courts, could require Parliament to weigh evidence, witnesses and questions of responsibility, and might prejudice the parties.
• The motion was lodged on 28 September by Habib Iddrisu, the MP for Tolon and the Minority's First Deputy Whip. It sought an Ad Hoc Committee to examine how large narcotics consignments were handled, checked, cleared and shipped out of Ghana.
• The motion pointed to a haul of 3.9 metric tonnes of cocaine found by French customs officers in Dunkirk harbour on 10 September 2026, which Onua Online and The Publisher Online say it valued at $261 million. It also cited 320 kilogrammes of methamphetamine seized by Australian authorities in June 2026 (dated 18 June by those two reports) and cocaine interceptions at Takoradi and at Pedu in Cape Coast in March 2025.
• Mr Afenyo-Markin rejected the ruling. He argued that the Speaker erred in letting criminal cases still in progress fix the limits of a parliamentary inquiry, and said the proposed committee would test how public institutions performed rather than decide whether any accused person is guilty.
• For Parliament's power to scrutinise state agencies, Mr Afenyo-Markin pointed to the 1992 Constitution, namely Articles 93(2) and 103. He also argued that the sub judice rule is no automatic bar on subjects tied to pending cases, and that Mr Bagbin could have admitted the motion with conditions, such as no findings on guilt and closed sittings where security required.
• Mr Afenyo-Markin charged that the Majority, helped by the Speaker, had leaned on its large numbers to weaken Parliament and dodge scrutiny of the seizures. He further claimed the NDC government fears its own failures, and said the ruling fell short of the integrity standard Parliament is expected to meet.
• The Minority Leader said his caucus would carry on through every legitimate avenue under the Constitution and the Standing Orders. “We will not let this matter rest,” he said.
• Mr Afenyo-Markin also said the government's 24-hour economy programme had turned into a 24-hour cocaine business, according to Adom Online and OmanGhana.
• Minority voices complained that the House did not give them a full hearing before the ruling. Mr Afenyo-Markin told Adom Online the Speaker denied the caucus a chance to be heard, and The Vaultz News reported Vincent Ekow Assafuah, the MP for Old Tafo, as saying the outcome appeared settled before the two leaders made their submissions.

What's disputed / unconfirmed

• ?
  In an interview on Adom TV, Mr Afenyo-Markin stood by his earlier description of Ghana as a possible cocaine hub, calling it a figure of speech about the country becoming a transit point, and said he owed no evidence for it. He also recounted that a Cabinet Minister had spoken of official involvement and of foreign partners mistrusting Ghana's systems, and said the Minority was only repeating concerns raised by the Interior Minister. No minister has been quoted confirming or answering this.
• ?
  The claims that the Majority and the Speaker acted to shield the government from scrutiny, and that the government fears exposure of its record, are Mr Afenyo-Markin's own. The available reports carry no reply from the Speaker or the Majority to them.
• ?
  MyJoyOnline reported that the Majority holds that police and other enforcement bodies ought to complete their probes before Parliament begins a separate inquiry, and Adom Online said the Majority backed the Speaker's ruling. No other report sets out the Majority's reasoning.
• ?
  The Ghana Report named Standing Order 101(3)(F) as the rule the Speaker relied on and said it limits motions on matters before the courts. Other reports refer to Standing Order 103, Sub-Rule F.
• ?
  Graphic Online reported the Speaker as saying four narcotics-related cases connected to the inquiry are before the courts with about 21 people on trial, that the Minority met the 15 per cent threshold under Article 112(3) for an extraordinary sitting, and that his ruling does not stop Parliament from exercising oversight of narcotics trafficking, port security and border controls. It also said the Dunkirk cocaine was in a container reportedly originating from Ghana. No other report carries these points.
• ?
  The Ghana Report said Habib Iddrisu disagreed with the Speaker's reasoning, argued that Parliament's constitutional power to investigate should not be overridden by its Standing Orders, cited Articles 103(3) and 103(6), and offered the Kpandai case, as the Speaker dealt with it, as an instance of Parliament acting while a matter is in court. No other report carries this.
• ?
  The Vaultz News quoted Mr Assafuah as describing the ruling as predetermined and as saying that reading Standing Order 103 F to bar the inquiry sets rules above the Constitution. He also said the Minority would weigh other parliamentary tools when the House returns from recess on 15 October. These views and the return date come from that report alone, and no reply from the Speaker has been reported.
• ?
  Michael Kosi Dedey, an engineer and policy analyst, told Channel One TV, as reported by Citi Newsroom, that he backed the Speaker's decision because earlier bipartisan probes were inconclusive or left recommendations unimplemented, and that Parliament tends to focus on politics over its core business. No other report carries his view.
• ?
  OmanGhana reported that the opposition is combing through the Constitution and parliamentary rules for another route to raise the transshipment worries in the chamber. No other report gives this detail.
• ?
  Onua Online reported that the NPP wants the bosses of three bodies, NACOC, the GMA and the Shippers Authority, dismissed in connection with narcotics cases. No other report mentions this demand.

Why it matters for Ghana

The dispute will shape whether Parliament, and not only the courts and investigators, gets to examine how drug consignments passed through Ghana's ports, customs systems and border controls. It also tests how far pending prosecutions can restrict the oversight role the Constitution gives MPs. With the Majority and Minority sharply divided, the outcome will influence how much public scrutiny the state's handling of narcotics cases receives.