Bagbin rules out Minority's drug-seizure inquiry and presses MPs to curb abusive language
The Speaker said a parliamentary probe would tread on cases already in court, though he left other forms of oversight open.
Kokonsa NewsroomFirst published Updated
Sensitive story. Allegations are reported as allegations, not as established fact.
Listen · 1:040:00 / 1:04
Politics · KokonsaConfirmed
Politics
Pinned summary · as of
Speaker Alban Bagbin has dismissed a Minority motion for a parliamentary inquiry into big drug seizures tied to Ghana, at an emergency sitting of the House on Tuesday, 29 September 2026. He reasoned that the proposed probe would cover ground already before the courts. In the same sitting he raised his worry about insults in public life and asked party leaders and MPs to set a better example.
What we know
Parliament was recalled for a one-day emergency sitting on Tuesday, 29 September 2026, after the Minority petitioned the Speaker and he summoned the House under Article 112(3) of the Constitution.
A private member's motion calling for an inquiry into major narcotics seizures connected to Ghana was thrown out by Mr Bagbin as inadmissible. He said the inquiry would overlap heavily with matters before the courts and could prejudice the parties in those cases.
The motion was filed on 28 September by Habib Iddrisu, the Tolon MP and First Deputy Minority Whip. It asked for an ad hoc committee to look at how the drug consignments were handled, inspected, cleared and exported, and it referred to seizures abroad, among them close to 3.9 tonnes of cocaine taken at Dunkirk, France, on 10 September.
According to the Speaker, the committee would end up weighing evidence, witnesses and questions of responsibility that already bear on criminal proceedings, and that could push Parliament into deciding matters reserved for a court.
The Speaker said his ruling does not stop Parliament from scrutinising narcotics control. MPs can still seek information from Ministers, examine state institutions, test whether drug laws are adequate and look at port and border security, provided they avoid a parallel fact-finding exercise that could harm cases in court.
Four narcotics cases involving about 21 people were before the courts. Graphic attributed this to the Speaker, while Rainbow Radio Online cited checks with the court registry.
Beyond the motion, Mr Bagbin said he was worried by the growing volume of abuse, menace and hate speech in the national conversation. He also said free speech and press freedom are guaranteed by the Constitution and that vigorous debate, satire and dissent are legitimate.
He asked the leaders of the main political parties to stop promoting members mainly because of their abusive or inflammatory language, warning that such rewards encourage others to copy it.
Mr Bagbin told MPs that Parliament cannot credibly ask journalists, broadcasters, bloggers and citizens to raise their standards unless it first examines its own members' conduct and leads by example.
The Speaker urged parliamentary committees, and the Human Rights Committee in particular, to act on their own initiative on human rights and public discourse instead of waiting for referrals.
President John Dramani Mahama has asked two bodies, the Ghana Journalists Association (GJA) and, alongside it, the Media Foundation for West Africa, to bring stakeholders together to discuss hate speech and abusive material online. Mr Bagbin backed the idea, called it timely, and said the discussion must be broad, inclusive and measured, and must not become a tool to silence dissent or shield officials from criticism.
President Mahama voiced concern about arrests over mere criticism, according to reports of his request for the engagement.
What's disputed / unconfirmed
?
Reports differ on which rules the Speaker relied on. MyJoyOnline, The Vaultz News and Graphic cite Standing Orders 5, 6 and 103 (sub-rule F). Onua Online and YEN.com.gh add Orders 192 and 233. Rainbow Radio Online refers to Orders 5(6) and 103(f), and MyNewsGH to Orders 56 and 103(5)(f).
?
Reports give different valuations for the Dunkirk consignment. Onua Online and YEN.com.gh put it at $261 million as cited in the motion, while The Custodian, citing the Minority's petition, says French authorities were reported to have priced it near €225 million, which it equates to roughly US$260 million.
?
Graphic and The Custodian say the Dunkirk cocaine was hidden in a container reported to have come from Ghana, the latter attributing this to the Minority's petition. This origin has not been confirmed by an official source.
?
The Custodian reports that the Minority also cited a cocaine haul of over 3.3 tonnes at Pedu Junction, Cape Coast, in March 2025, said to be worth above US$350 million, and a June 2026 methamphetamine seizure in Australia it valued at about US$208 million. These values come from the Minority and are reported by that publication only.
?
The Vaultz News quotes the Speaker as saying his decision turned on how and when the motion was brought, not on the merits of the claims about the seizures. No other report carries that explanation.
?
MyJoyOnline reports that Minority Leader Alexander Afenyo-Markin asked the Speaker to let caucus leaders make full submissions before ruling and said the country's image was under scrutiny. The report does not say how the Speaker responded.
?
The Ghanaian Chronicle reports that the Speaker warned MPs against describing the matter as a cover-up and threatened drastic action against anyone who repeated the allegation on the floor. That report is the only one to include the warning.
?
According to the Ghanaian Chronicle, Mr Afenyo-Markin said foreign partners might hesitate to share intelligence with Ghana, pointing to remarks made earlier by the Interior Minister, Mohammed Mubarak Muntaka. Mr Muntaka replied in the Chamber that he had referred only to security and law-enforcement officers who could compromise investigations, not to Ministers, and that the government treats crime as crime whoever is involved.
?
OmanGhana reports that the Minority criticised the ruling as damaging to parliamentary oversight, while the Majority backed it, and that security analysts supporting the decision stressed protecting live investigations. Those reactions are carried by that publication alone.
?
The Custodian reports that the Minority insisted its inquiry was aimed at institutional weaknesses, not at deciding the guilt of suspects, and that Walewale MP Dr Kabiru Tiah Mahama withdrew a remark calling the Speaker's decision to recall the House rude and apologised. Neither point appears elsewhere.
?
Graphic dates the Speaker's address to Parliament as Friday, 29 September, whereas the other reports place the sitting on Tuesday, 29 September 2026.
?
Onua Online reports that the President's request was set out in a letter dated 22 September 2026 signed by his Secretary, Dr Callistus Mahama. YEN.com.gh separately recalls that the President ordered a task force after a security meeting on 17 September to draw up a plan against drug smuggling within two weeks. Each detail comes from one report only.
Why it matters for Ghana
The ruling means Parliament will not, for now, open its own inquiry into how drug consignments linked to Ghana passed through the country's ports, so answers will come from the courts and investigators. That matters for public confidence in port security and for Ghana's standing with trading partners. The Speaker's remarks on abusive speech and the planned social media dialogue also affect how citizens, journalists and online commentators can criticise officials without facing new restrictions.
A submission flags this story immediately and is reviewed against our corrections policy.