kokonsa
SportsDeveloping

Minority demands audit of Black Stars and GFA as coaching debate grows

Lawmakers say swapping the head coach will not fix the team, while a newspaper columnist argues for local coaches over Carlos Queiroz.

Sensitive story. Allegations are reported as allegations, not as established fact.

Listen · 1:070:00 / 1:07

Pinned summary · as of

Ghana's Minority in Parliament has called for a full review of how football is run, a day after the Black Stars lost 4-2 to The Gambia in an Africa Cup of Nations qualifier in Accra. Separately, a column in The Ghana Report has questioned whether the country should keep relying on foreign coaches such as Carlos Queiroz.

What we know

  • Attention has turned to the direction of the Black Stars after the team's weak showing at the 2026 World Cup and the latest qualifying setback, with both The Ghana Report and Onua Online carrying views on what should change.

What's disputed / unconfirmed

  • Onua Online put the scoreline at 4-2 in The Gambia's favour, in a 2027 Africa Cup of Nations qualifier played in Accra on 29 September; no other report has repeated the score.
  • In a statement issued on 30 September, the Minority said the national team's problems began before the present coach arrived and that a new coach alone would not solve them. Ranking Member Vincent Ekow Assafuah of Parliament's Youth and Sports Committee said swapping coaches without studying the structures around them risks repeating the same cycle. The Minority's position was carried by Onua Online only.
  • The Minority asked for scrutiny of the Ghana Football Association (GFA), how the national sides are technically run, and the sports ministry, and for answers on player selection, scouting, preparation and spending. It also called for an outside audit of the Black Stars covering both coaching and administration. These demands have not been answered publicly in the reports available.
  • The Minority further proposed a review of GFA governance, merit-based player selection, a technical direction with measurable targets, open accounts on bonuses, travel and preparation, and fresh funding for juvenile football, academies, schools and the local leagues. It added that any change must respect Ghana's laws and the rules of FIFA and CAF, and that its assessment should guide reform rather than a search for a scapegoat.
  • The Minority summed up its case by saying the game needs the whole system reset, not only a different man on the touchline.
  • The Ghana Report reported President John Dramani Mahama as saying that keeping Carlos Queiroz could help Ghana win a future AFCON or World Cup. The report relies on an earlier news item and was not corroborated elsewhere.
  • A columnist in The Ghana Report argued that Ghana has appointed 48 national coaches since George Ainsley in 1958, 27 of them foreign and 21 Ghanaian, and that Ghanaian coaches have substantively led the side 18 times against 27 for foreigners. These figures are the columnist's own count.
  • The same columnist said nearly all of Ghana's 13 major trophies came under Ghanaian coaches, the exception being the 1991 FIFA U-17 World Cup under Otto Pfister, and named C.K. Gyamfi as the most successful coach after the 1963, 1965 and 1982 AFCON titles. He also said Queiroz is 73, preferred Ghanaian coaches, named Walid Regragui as his choice if a foreigner is needed, and said he had heard Dede Ayew may run for GFA president. These are opinions and unverified talk from one column.

Why it matters for Ghana

The Black Stars are followed closely in every region of Ghana, and the choice of who coaches them, and how the GFA and the sports ministry are held to account, affects how public money for the national teams is used. Supporters in Accra, Kumasi and Tamale are watching whether the debate leads to an audit or only to another coaching change. The argument also shapes how youth and domestic football are funded.

A submission flags this story immediately and is reviewed against our corrections policy.

Related stories